Despite these gains, between 1500 and 1800, Europe had little influence on the lives of the peoples of China, India or Africa. Such as the telephone, What were the negative and positive effects of imperialism on India, improved roads, trains, expanded postal networks. By having a colony in Africa, Europeans would have easy accessibility to cheap labor, and be part of the slave trade. Since its discovery, Europeans were trying get a piece of India's action. Natives had no role in the government which was pathetic. American culture, including clothing, music and food, has had a large impact on other countries. Nepal was also a Hindu kingdom.
The food supply boomed because Britain encouraged traveling herders to settle down and farm land. A need for loaning for the poor. The wealth of India was plundered andused for the benefit of the British. Also there were some princely states in India during colonial period which never ruled by Britain. But Britain cannot colonize and exploit Nepal. The cause of British domination was that the land was very diverse and the people could not unite and that the British either paid local princes or used weapons to get control. Major cites like Calcutta became major trading cites to Asia and the rest of the world.
These helped stimulate the economy, flow of knowledge and people. Their original interest was in the trading of spices, which were abundant in this particular colony. Samyuktha, India Britain was the biggest robber of the 18th century. Indian culture was lost, people were repressed, and the social order was completely destroyed. If the British hadn't done it, then others would have - and arguably done a worse job! One would strike out, and the other would retaliate. India's ancient History is all of imperialism -ofKings and Rajas.
As for the positives: again it depends which imperial power youhave in mind. This was also done in Africa, Japan, Indonesia. To be quite honest, there were no positive effects of China being conquered by foreign interests. Although the effects were not as devastating they still caused some change. Battles amongst colonizers and colonies became a constant. When the world wars came and Britain desperately needed the money they made some inhumane decisions that lead to famine and death to try and provide for the motherland.
Not only this railroads were built, but also telephone lines, damns and irrigation canals now modernized India. Nationalism was prominent in almost every country. Literacy increased due to the foundation of many colleges and schools. Yet another feature of ageing in. And finally, people had somewhat more say in the government. White collar jobs were reserved only for the Imperialists.
Imperialism in India British imperialism on India had many positive and negative affects on both the mother country, Britain and the colony, India. In the parts under the Companys rule, natives were mostly left to live with their own laws and costumes concerning things such as religion or education, however they had to abide the demands for donations and tribute towards the Company, usually in the form of crops and produce. India was not the only country affected by the annex to the British empire though. Obviously, this system made less profit then the taxation system before it, so the Dutch started to cultivate larger and larger areas of Indonesia. The colonization of India by the British saw both positive and negative effects.
People learned about bacteria, contagion, hygiene, crop rotation. The British expanded control over India because in the beginning of the 19the century, companies ruled India with little interference in the British government. The increased amount of farmers expanded into the rain forest, increasing arable land. Between 1640 and 1949, India was ruled by two periods of imperialism, both of which effected India in a very profound and permanent manner. India finally gained full independence from the United Kingdom in 1950, the Indian constitution and the parliamentary system of government's design was influenced by Great Britain. But the colonised people derived great benefit from it. When changes in the decadal growth rate in the general population are compared with those for the elderly population, it is noted that the latter grew at a relatively much faster rate than the general population, since 1951.
Among those campaigning for Indian nationalism was Ghandi, a civil rights leader who advocated non-violent civil disobedience. Over the years Europeans had begun placing themselves on a pedestal that they believed they could never be knocked… involvement in Africa was unbeatably imperialism. The British had built roads, railways, canals, irrigation, mills, and factories to further the increase in economy and transportation. Unfortunately, this change caused a flood of Dutch entrepreneurs to enter Indonesia, who established plantations, and bought up land, all over Indonesia, including places outside of Java. It should be remembered though that applying todays standards to events and regimes of the past result in an unbalanced, chrono-centric position; civilizations, whether influenced by European empires or not, are evolutionary, and develop still.
The result was that Indian workers did not have nearly enough money to support themselves and their families. Unfortunately, barring some exceptions, the so-called leaders, ministers and government officials we have had over the past 50 years have done precious little to improve our lot. The European countries also made existing forms of transportation more efficient and reliable, and they brought new forms of transportation to Africa. He believed in a religious, peaceful approach to political activity. Britain is prosperous today because it stole and will not return the wealth of these lands. Beginning in the 1800's though they, of theirown accord, began allowing in Western ideas … and seeking tomodernize their economy and, to some extent, westernize theirsociety.