The anti-federalists have high regard or respect for the Articles of Confederation unlike the federalists. The Federalists tended to place … their faith in the talents of a small governing elite. The power of a state to quell insurrection within its own borders is not precluded by the Constitution. In the case of the Federalists vs. · Congress may, even in time of peace, raise an army of 100,000 men, whom they may canton through the several states, and billet out on the inhabitants, in order to serve as necessary instruments in executing their decrees.
People like Patrick Henry, Edmund Randolph and others who feared that centralized power was an invitation to tyranny, were anti-federalists. They wanted a weaker central government that would mainly assist the state governments by providing basic functions like defense, , and setting foreign policy. With the assistance of the Federalist Papers, the Federalists were able to break down resistance and gain enough support to ratify the Constitution. Although not all of the States underwent the extreme of the Rhode Island case, many of them had a bit of difficulty deciding which side they were on. These subjects would be covered in the first eight of ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights.
There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The need for a Bill of Rights 3. Only when these rights were included in the constitution did the anti-federalists gave support to ratify the. More than half-way there in four months, one might think that the battle was nearly won. One of the government's prime functions was to maintain order. The Articles of Confederation were restrictive to progress and needed to be replaced.
We analyze… 885 Words 4 Pages Compromise between Federalist and Anti-Federalist My thesis is that the plan was to amend the articles of confederation, but there was too much wrong with it, because it gave too much federal power. Eventually the less-popular Federalists lost their power and for a period of time America had a one-party system within the Anti-Federalist party called the Democrat Republicans. It is still possible that the Congress could flex its muscle in this way, though it seems unlikely. The Federalists continued to lobby and eventually earned the ratification of Virginia and New York in the summer of 1788. At the rate of one for every thirty thousand, today we would have over nine thousand representatives in the House. Ratification by the states was by no means a fore gone conclusion in 1887. The Bill, Amendments 1-10, eased the minds of many hold-outs.
Many Federalists were educated, wealthy men like those who had drawn up the Declaration of Independence. The largest issue that the Anti-Federalists had with the proposed constitution was that it lacked a bill of rights. How did the Anti-Federalists feel about the federal courts? The federalists differ from the anti-federalists in terms of social, economic, and political expression. They believed the power to tax was necessary to provide national defense and to repay debts to other nations. Patrick Henry, a famous patriot and lawyer, provided support for the antifederalists.
Anti-federalists also feared that these aristocrats may later on control the lower class if their proposed Constitution is ratified. He also understood that amendments to the Constitution could only be passed either by a new Constitutional Convention or by a two-thirds vote of both houses of Congress. This is true — but the reason was an eminently practical one. Today, it is easy to accept that the prevailing side was right and claim that, had you been alive, you would have certainly supported ratifying the Constitution. The Bill of Rights is the first 10 amendments to the constitutio … n this helped gain the support that the Federalists needed for the Constitution to be approved.
And in Virginia, Patrick Henry was a political rival of James Madison. The less the power of the federal government, the less th … e potential for abuse. While I found the arguments of the Anti-Federalists compelling, I believe that a stronger, unified government was necessary at the time. The primacy of contracts and their inviolability by the government, state or federal, is a key feature of the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists did not want a repeat of the Revolutionary War. Thus, it is poised to leave the common people and the poor class out of the scene, they said. They wanted the House of Representatives increased in size so it would reflect a greater variety of popular interests.
One of the great debates in American history was over the ratification of the Constitution in 1787-1788. Their great success was in forcing the first Congress under the new Constitution to establish a bill of rights to ensure the liberties that the Antifederalists felt the Constitution violated. Today's modern military would probably alarm even the most strident Federalist, but our military evolved with time and most Americans cannot imagine the world without a strong national military. Anything not delegated to the federal government would be reserved to the people and the states. This uncertainty played a major role in the ratification convention in Massachusetts.