Make sure to clearly and thoroughly explain why you believe the counter is invalid. Be sure that everything you write is relevant to that central problem. The reason lies in the purpose of your paper, which is to present the strongest case for your thesis. Neither should you present any arguments that pose an indirect question or are based on generic assumptions. You can keep this section to a minimum or even skip it altogether and jump straight to the point.
You need to leave yourself enough time to think about the topic and write a detailed outline. P might still be true, for all that. Even in your own experience, you make choices as to the best teaching methods for different courses and content: sometimes lecture is most appropriate; other times you may use service—learning, for example. Spelling mistakes and grammatical errors can distract a reader and divert her attention from your argument. Some of those guidelines are routinely violated in good philosophical prose e. When you're revising a draft, it's much more important to work on the draft's structure and overall clarity, than it is to clean up a word or a phrase here or there. The second of these introductions is superior to the first.
To check whether the work matches the requirements, download and study the corresponding writing style manual online or use free templates. This is, in essence, what a philosophy paper is about. Your evaluation should work to support your thesis at all times. Developing a research paper outline requires having an overall. This will help you refer or read more about a point when you start writing the draft. To see that this is so, notice that the person who denies the conclusion - that abortion is morally wrong - will not accept Smith's premise that it amounts to murder, since murder is, by definition, morally wrong.
If not, how might you clarify these concepts? Some students confuse them with research papers, essays on Literature or any other kinds of academic papers and get rather low marks for them. It is a good idea to let your outline simmer for a few days before you write your first draft. So, the safest path to writing an A+ philosophy paper is assuming that your reader is as intelligent as you, but does not share your views on the subject. To sum it up, the essence of how to write a philosophy paper thesis statement and make it solid is in remembering that if your statement and your argument are obvious to you, they are not necessarily as obvious to your reader. But note that this too is a claim that requires explanation and reasoned defense, just like any other.
Merely summarizing what others have said won't be enough. Notice that only the second presents an actual thesis statement. Once again, you cannot expect your reader to agree with you. Suggest several different ways of understanding the view. It is better to write in your own voice and use simple, direct language to get your point across. Trying to be creative prior to that point might actually prevent your paper from achieving optimal clarity, cogency, and concision. Then, there are the terms.
Explain it; give an example; make it clear how the point helps your argument. Argument is where you are expected to describe your position on the matter, using logical methods to reach the conclusion you believe is true. If Smith argues that abortion is morally wrong on the grounds that it amounts to murder, Smith begs the question. Anticipate objections Try to anticipate objections to your view and respond to them. This begins with outlining your essay. At this point, students frequently make one or more of several common errors. Here I respond to a possible objection to my argument.
Remember, writing well is hard work. Instead, it should be a rational, factual defense of a chosen thesis. Some questions you might consider: does her argument succeed in getting to the desired conclusion? The next sections of such assignment are equally important, and a student should be ready to provide defense assuming the audience may have an opposite position regarding the chosen topic. Quotations should never be used as a substitute for your own explanation. But I hope you'll all do better than that. What examples would you use? Sometimes they feel that since it is clear to them that their thesis is true, it does not need much argumentation.
Pretend that your reader has not read the material you're discussing, and has not given the topic much thought in advance. On the contrary, imagine that the reader is constantly disagreeing and doubts every single assertion you make. Don't write using prose you wouldn't use in conversation: if you wouldn't say it, don't write it. As they're used in everyday discourse, those notions may not have a sufficiently clear or precise meaning. Even if you have managed to write essays without an outline before, this is not the best idea for this particular type of paper. It is necessary to acknowledge all the literary sources that were used in composing a paper. And even if it so, why would you mention arguments that are opposite to your opinion? Which will, once again, affect your academic score — and not in a good way.