Certainly high school students have the sensibility to know what they want to view and what they don't. There are practical and educational as well as legal reasons to adhere as closely as possible to the ideals of the First Amendment. Elected representatives from across the country are responsible for setting policy, which includes resolutions on selecting and developing education materials and teaching techniques. No one forces students to read something they don't want to. There are many opinions as to whether the case was a victory for either side, but the fact of the matter is that the information was now out and being talked about.
If these and other individual preferences were legitimate criteria for censoring materials used in school, the curriculum would narrow to including only the least controversial and probably least relevant material. It matters little whether such intervention occurs avowedly or through action that inevitably tends to check the ardor and fearlessness of scholars, qualities at once so fragile and so indispensable for fruitful academic labor…. There is also the increased concern by citizens that society has become too permissive, and that permissiveness is most apparent in the schools. Con This is my first debate on this website, so excuse me if I don't follow a certain format, or do this incorrectly. Educational advisory boards can also assist educators in discerning the community's needs and perspectives. Censorship of art and books should not be enforced because it intrudes on the rights of a person.
It should be unthinkable in a country like ours. Practically all classic literature has been banned at one point or another. Provide contact information for the school board, and encourage readers to urge school officials to retain the book. It prevents the nurturing of ideas and opinions in students. For this reason, young children usually do not learn physics or read Shakespeare.
Book-banning has been going on for a long time in the United States. Another school in Connecticut cut off access to Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube for the day to show solidarity with students who lacked more open access. They are not committing an act of censorship every time they cross a book off of a reading list, but if they decide to remove a book because of hostility to the ideas it contains, they could be. The purpose of this research paper is to discuss Censorship can take different shapes depending on the public school system: Schools can give teachers a list of acceptable books to teach, just provide guidelines, or leave it up to the teachers to judge which books are appropriate Agee, 1999. Society of Sisters, 268 U.
Censorship is crippling, negating, stifling. Some people, unfortunately, are censored and denied the right to express their opinion because it is different. One teacher, who provided a wide range of contemporary literature for her seniors, talked about how she tried to head off potential problems: Anything I read, even for myself, I'm always thinking of bringing into the classroom, and, indeed you'll see my library in there. It is important for teachers and administrators to be familiar with these policies and understand their significant function. However, courts defer to administrators and educators equally when their decisions promote, rather than suppress, speech—as when schools administrators elect to include controversial materials in the curriculum Monteiro v. Many incidents involve only one complaint, but can nonetheless trigger a contentious review process.
Indeed, for such adults a pristine vision of youth often forms a wall between themselves and any adolescents they happen to know. They also provide important information about resources and strategies for teachers who want more information about censorship issues or court cases. When we strip teachers of their professional judgment, we forfeit the educational vitality we prize. Instead of exercising unreasonable censorship, schools should encourage students to express themselves freely, as a way to teach students to peacefully accept and tolerate different beliefs. Education in a democratic society requires developing citizens who can adapt to changing times, make decisions about social issues, and effectively judge the performance of public officials. Such concerns may justify a parent's request that his or her child be assigned alternate material, and many school policies provide this as an alternative to removing a book for an entire class. Elected representatives from across the country are responsible for setting policy, which includes resolutions on selecting and developing education materials and teaching techniques.
Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The role of professional journals and books are also critical components in creating a public forum for censorship issues. We must be cautious of what is being censored and who is making the decisions about it. Its decision should only be reversed for compelling educational reasons. Including censorship issues in a secondary school English curriculum is another strategy for bringing critical questions about students right to read into the classroom in a proactive way.
Others think schools are wrong to allow discussion about sexual orientation in sex education or family life classes, and others would eliminate The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from the English curriculum because of racial references. Because everyone thinks they are right, if something is new or different, it will, more often than not, be disliked because people do not like to hear new and different ideas. Otherwise, censorship can cut down on the effectiveness of education. We hope it provides students, teachers and administrators with a deeper understanding of their constitutionally guaranteed rights and responsibilities, as well as renewed respect for the power of free expression to enhance the educational experience. No one should underestimate the vital role in a democracy that is played by those who guide and train our youth. Although complainants may not have a broad knowledge of literature or of the principles of freedom of expression, their motives in questioning a book or other library material are seldom unusual.